
I’m not gay. I know barely one iota about what it’s like to be gay. But I’ve heard bits and pieces. And some of those bits say, it’s not so easy growing up gay. The word is that 14-year-old kids throw insults your mother would slap you for. They say things that make other kids cry in bathrooms. And in the very gymnasiums of my own past, I’ve seen straight-A students, star athletes, and class officers hurl all manner of physical, verbal, and emotional abuse at a certain kind of kid. A gay kid.
I’m not gay, but I realize that it’s a hard trip down the timeline for many kids, teens, and adults. And I think it’s fair to say that trip’s rougher than most of us had to endure in the very same playgrounds and schools.
I’m not gay, but I have seen the kind of flak that regular, law-abiding people have had to endure simply because of a stranger’s opinion of what’s absolutely none of their business. And that’s why it makes me very disappointed when I see my countrymen stomping on people just because of how they love other people. Not children, not animals. People.
And so you see, it embarrasses me when my American sisters and brothers are so superstitious that they’d theorize about what two strangers might do if they tie the knot. They hypothesize, infer, and assume things when they don’t even know a single gay person themselves. To me, that’s lazy. That’s yell from the couch lazy, my fellow Americans.
So, it makes me wonder, is all this really about marriage? Or is it about love? And if marriage isn’t about love, then what is IT about? Kids? Tax breaks? Property rights? Protection under the law? If marriage is that bureaucratic, it seems that by law, we can’t discriminate.
And if it’s something more, then may be we could feel a little shame, my fellow. Americans.
If it is just a matter of you objecting to the use of the ”word” marriage, then propose a euphemism for the word.
The second that you decide that certain humans do not deserve any rights, is the second that you become a Nazi or a slave owner or a pimp or a child molester or rapist or a Taliban or any of the other groups that view some people as less than human.
It then becomes very easy to justify violence and oppression. Once that group is subdued, then you find other groups that are not quiet human enough for your tastes and on and on and on until you have winnowed away humanity to only included people who are just like you.
You must be one of those that has a list of prerequesites before rendering someone human or worthy of justice and equality.
They are human, we all are..Gay, straight, bi, trans, and everything and color in between.
You are very right while saying that "is it all about marriage or other rights". I think people don’t want to discuss the other rights of Gays and they have made only gays marriage an issue. These are the deliberate attempts to divert the people’s minds from other issues of gays.
For instance, hate crime laws, assault and murder are already crimes but the laws are used to pit jurors against one another based on race or sexual orientation.
Domestic violence laws are sometimes used by women to exact revenge against their partners since those laws have harsher penalties than simple battery laws.
Why all crimes are not treated equally is a mystery to me.
Let them live the way they want to. Others should rather focus on their own marriages.
My understanding of marraige is when two people want to acknowledge their committment and love to each other as in a legal partner ship.
Many ”normal” marraiges fail or a partner can die so they can then turn to the legal processes to sort out assets etc.
This right should be given to all partnerships, and if they want to be married let them make the legal commitment.
Love is love - and what right has any one to judge people who love each other and want commitment.
There just isn’t enough love of any kind in this world.
What is all this fas about “marriage” and “civic registration”?
Australia recognises same-sex unions - for state safe-network reasons surely. Why not people to register for being responsible over wellbeing of partners and offspring if any?
Was natural copulating with a stable partner registered in the ancient times pre-historical or this is a costly ceremonial to legalise sexual relations in exchange for providing life-hood as appeared much later?
And all these religious attachments-let Lord have what belongs to the Lord, and Caesar-what belongs to Caesar: in a free world strangers are not supposed to pip through bedroom doors, also sex-rumours are a hot topic saturating anything in/by/with media quite openly.
And ye, we live in an overpopulated and crowded world. Gay marriages would at least help in reducing some number.
And why is this not considered in India and China? They have one of the must skewed female/male ratios in the world, only next to Arabs. In case of Arabs, we can’t talk this as talking gay marriage to Arabs is like committing suicide. I think population control would be the most helpful thing out of legalizing gay marriages.
What does happen is that they get someone else to have babies for them or go to sperm banks. But it is expensive and difficult so they rarely have more than 2.
very few of them want children but what they do want is be able visit their partners in the hospital when the hospital only allows family members. They also want to be able to own property together, have rights of inheritance, tax breaks that are given to other families and joint health insurance.
Think about it like this, I can sign my husband’s paycheck, put the money in the bank and then write out checks to pay the mortgage on our house, if we were not married, I couldn’t do that.
If we weren’t married, we would have to have separate contracts written up to allow me to have power of attorney over his business matters, and another to have joint ownership of our house and another to state that I lived there to be able to order utilities. If he died his will could be contested by his family members and those people would get control over property that I paid half of and on and on and on. It is a practical matter but most people are too emotional to be practical.
The fact that people can be discriminated against due to religious pressures is barbaric and inhumane.
Local Opinions (13)
You are very right while saying that "is it all about marriage or other rights". I think people don’t want to discuss the other rights of Gays and they have made only gays marriage an issue. These are the deliberate attempts to divert the people’s minds from other issues of gays.
If it is just a matter of you objecting to the use of the ”word” marriage, then propose a euphemism for the word.
The second that you decide that certain humans do not deserve any rights, is the second that you become a Nazi or a slave owner or a pimp or a child molester or rapist or a Taliban or any of the other groups that view some people as less than human.
It then becomes very easy to justify violence and oppression. Once that group is subdued, then you find other groups that are not quiet human enough for your tastes and on and on and on until you have winnowed away humanity to only included people who are just like you.
For instance, hate crime laws, assault and murder are already crimes but the laws are used to pit jurors against one another based on race or sexual orientation.
Domestic violence laws are sometimes used by women to exact revenge against their partners since those laws have harsher penalties than simple battery laws.
Why all crimes are not treated equally is a mystery to me.
What does happen is that they get someone else to have babies for them or go to sperm banks. But it is expensive and difficult so they rarely have more than 2.
very few of them want children but what they do want is be able visit their partners in the hospital when the hospital only allows family members. They also want to be able to own property together, have rights of inheritance, tax breaks that are given to other families and joint health insurance.
Think about it like this, I can sign my husband’s paycheck, put the money in the bank and then write out checks to pay the mortgage on our house, if we were not married, I couldn’t do that.
If we weren’t married, we would have to have separate contracts written up to allow me to have power of attorney over his business matters, and another to have joint ownership of our house and another to state that I lived there to be able to order utilities. If he died his will could be contested by his family members and those people would get control over property that I paid half of and on and on and on. It is a practical matter but most people are too emotional to be practical.
The fact that people can be discriminated against due to religious pressures is barbaric and inhumane.
Global Opinions (11)
Let them live the way they want to. Others should rather focus on their own marriages.
My understanding of marraige is when two people want to acknowledge their committment and love to each other as in a legal partner ship.
Many ”normal” marraiges fail or a partner can die so they can then turn to the legal processes to sort out assets etc.
This right should be given to all partnerships, and if they want to be married let them make the legal commitment.
Love is love - and what right has any one to judge people who love each other and want commitment.
There just isn’t enough love of any kind in this world.
You must be one of those that has a list of prerequesites before rendering someone human or worthy of justice and equality.
They are human, we all are..Gay, straight, bi, trans, and everything and color in between.
What is all this fas about “marriage” and “civic registration”?
Australia recognises same-sex unions - for state safe-network reasons surely. Why not people to register for being responsible over wellbeing of partners and offspring if any?
Was natural copulating with a stable partner registered in the ancient times pre-historical or this is a costly ceremonial to legalise sexual relations in exchange for providing life-hood as appeared much later?
And all these religious attachments-let Lord have what belongs to the Lord, and Caesar-what belongs to Caesar: in a free world strangers are not supposed to pip through bedroom doors, also sex-rumours are a hot topic saturating anything in/by/with media quite openly.
And ye, we live in an overpopulated and crowded world. Gay marriages would at least help in reducing some number.
And why is this not considered in India and China? They have one of the must skewed female/male ratios in the world, only next to Arabs. In case of Arabs, we can’t talk this as talking gay marriage to Arabs is like committing suicide. I think population control would be the most helpful thing out of legalizing gay marriages.
Home

Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Stumble Upon
Technorati
Mixx
Sphinn
Twitter
SphereIt
Propeller
Gmarks
Newsvine
Yahoo! My Web
Live Journal
Blinklist
E-mail
RSS 



















